- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:37:29 -0400
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <502E6539.1000408@openlinksw.com>
On 8/17/12 11:04 AM, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:20:23AM -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) >>> associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of >>> an IRI). How about that? >> +1 (I'm happy with those terms, and I take your point, in an >> earlier email, about different naming conventions working for >> different communities, even if I'm not sure which communities are >> more or less ready for RDF.) > +0.5 - the terms seem okay as long as there's a good story for the difference > between a "data source" and a "dataset", and between a "dataset" and a "triple > collection". > > Tom > Tom, Yes. Data Source -- where you get the data from Dataset -- an actual collection of triples. Thus, you can have a single Data Source Name associated with one or more datasets; which can also be associated with one or more triples. I believe this can also be mapped to what's expressed in many a VoiD graph out in the wild. It also works for SPARQL, even if a Named Graph -- in some cases -- maps (ultimately) as a specific Dataset i.e., a Dataset with a Name (which could be an IRI). In a sense, we are still doing denotative indirection albeit not being driven by actual IRI/URI de-reference, using HTTP. Instead, this happens as part of the SPARQL solution construction. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:35:54 UTC