- From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:04:09 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:20:23AM -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote: > >You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) > >associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of > >an IRI). How about that? > > +1 (I'm happy with those terms, and I take your point, in an > earlier email, about different naming conventions working for > different communities, even if I'm not sure which communities are > more or less ready for RDF.) +0.5 - the terms seem okay as long as there's a good story for the difference between a "data source" and a "dataset", and between a "dataset" and a "triple collection". Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:04:43 UTC