W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: graph terminology

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:04:09 -0400
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120817150409.GA86459@alpha.dublincore.org>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:20:23AM -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> >You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections)
> >associated with RDF data source names (which can take the form of
> >an IRI). How about that?
> +1    (I'm happy with those terms, and I take your point, in an
> earlier email, about different naming conventions working for
> different communities, even if I'm not sure which communities are
> more or less ready for RDF.)

+0.5 - the terms seem okay as long as there's a good story for the difference
between a "data source" and a "dataset", and between a "dataset" and a "triple


Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 15:04:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:06 UTC