Re: graph terminology

On 8/17/12 10:20 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 09:57 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 8/17/12 9:52 AM, David Wood wrote:
>>> On Aug 17, 2012, at 09:09, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> With apologies for breaching the worm-can.
>>> Yeah, I was really hoping we could make some progress without 
>>> getting lost in naming.  It is not our most important problem. 
>>> Besides, polymorphic naming is everywhere in our language not just 
>>> in computer science.  I am not swayed by objections to it.
>>>
>>> So, I don't particularly care about the term space and won't fight 
>>> over it.  "source" works for me, and I would accept the others.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>
>> You have RDF data sources (datasets or triple collections) associated 
>> with RDF data source names (which can take the form of an IRI). How 
>> about that?
>>
>
> +1    (I'm happy with those terms, and I take your point, in an 
> earlier email, about different naming conventions working for 
> different communities, even if I'm not sure which communities are more 
> or less ready for RDF.)
>
> (Can we try to be good about our subject lines?   Some people really 
> don't want to be involved in this bit of the discussion.)

Okay :-)

Kingsley
>
>      -- Sandro
>
>> Kingsley
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen