Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Sep telecon

Regrets from Steve and myself, we can't make the call today. 

Mischa
On 28 Sep 2011, at 15:42, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:16 +0200, William Waites wrote:
>>>>>>> "cygri" == Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> writes:
>> 
>>    cygri> Regrets for today. I'm at a project meeting.
>> 
>> Likewise for me, unfortunately...
>> 
>>    cygri> I'd like to see a check for consensus for 2d.
>> 
>> Personally I still favour 3a then 3b and am not really convinced by the
>> "modelling languages is hard" and "using the datatype machinery in anger
>> is risky" arguments.
> 
> Me, too, but I think we're beyond the strawpoll of personal favorites
> and on to the question of whether there is some solution everyone can
> tolerate so we can be done with this issue.    The survey results...
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46168/tagged_literals/results
> 
> show only (1) and (2d) as not having a large number of objectors, and
> the preference between those two gives us (2d).   So, in the interest of
> moving on, I'm now happy to support 2d.
> 
> I like the point someone made recently that there is a migration path
> from 2d to 3a, and perhaps 3a supporters can explore that for the
> future.    But at this point, I'm thinking we have a lot of other work
> that's probably more urgent.
> 
>  -- Sandro
> 
> 
>> Cheers,
>> -w
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

___________________________________
Mischa Tuffield PhD
Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com
Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/
+44(0)208 439 8200  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 15:05:31 UTC