- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:21:51 -0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > > > On 22/11/11 21:09, Alex Hall wrote: >> >> I should also point out that the Turtle editor's draft DOES allow >> Unicode escapes in prefixed names, so it's removing them that would be a >> change. > The current Turtle Editor's draft and currently published WD is inconsistent. It was intended to allow escape sequences in prefix names to align with SPARQL. > Thank you for pointing it out - I was looking at an old doc. > > But it isn't clear to me - what does it allow there? Spaces? ">"? And the > text and the grammar are not aligned. It's not clear to the editor what's allowed any more, so I doubt it's clear to anyone else. > > I was hoping to separate the two issues (unicode escapes, range of > characters) so as to make progress. Yes, please. This conflation exists in the current grammar and text as well. Some chars are allowed only if escaped (maybe by some readings). > > Andy > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 00:22:28 UTC