Re: RDF-ISSUE-80 (rdf:PlainLiteral): Ask OWL and RIF WGs to update the rdf:PlainLiteral spec [RDF General]

On 17 Nov 2011, at 19:14, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> The obvious way of getting those into two slots is now to define a “compatibility lexical space” and “compatibility L2V mapping” for rdf:langString. The effect would be that "chat"@en has a normal “RDF lexical form” (“chat”) and a “compatibility lexical form” (“chat@en”). The latter is not part of RDF graphs, but it can be used in “compatibility graphs” or whatever you want to call the two-slot representation.
> That makes sense.    I wonder if anyone feels motivated to do it....

Well, ask them – see subject line ;-)


Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 19:20:19 UTC