- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:22:14 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 12 Nov 2011, at 08:01, Ivan Herman wrote: > I wonder whether, at the end, we should not add some words about the updated version of the g-* terminology. Yes, absolutely. This may become easier once the multigraph design is closer to completion. > My goal is to make an even more crisp differentiation between the model and the serialization; we all know that conflating these terms for the general public has done a huge harm. Ie, hammering this difference may be useful... +1 Best, Richard > > Ivan > > > > On Nov 11, 2011, at 20:22 , Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> The 2004 RDF Concepts spec starts with six pages of informative front matter, followed by six pages of normative text. >> >> From a 2011 point of view, the informative first part is not very good. I'd like to replace all of it with new text that is: >> >> * significantly shorter >> * more relevant to understanding RDF >> * a better reflection of 2011 understanding >> * introduces more useful terms not mentioned in the 2004 version >> (resource, vocabulary, concrete syntax, …) >> * less redundant with the later normative sections >> >> I've drafted new text (using bits of the old text where possible). It's ~2 pages. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Rcygania2/RDF_Concepts_Introduction >> >> I'd appreciate comments on the draft, and please speak up if you have fundamental concerns about this step. >> >> Best, >> Richard >> >> >> (Housekeeping: ISSUE-68) > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 12 November 2011 11:22:43 UTC