Re: A new introduction section for RDF Concepts

On 12 Nov 2011, at 08:01, Ivan Herman wrote:
> I wonder whether, at the end, we should not add some words about the updated version of the g-* terminology.

Yes, absolutely. This may become easier once the multigraph design is closer to completion.

> My goal is to make an even more crisp differentiation between the model and the serialization; we all know that conflating these terms for the general public has done a huge harm. Ie, hammering this difference may be useful...

+1

Best,
Richard




> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 20:22 , Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> 
>> The 2004 RDF Concepts spec starts with six pages of informative front matter, followed by six pages of normative text.
>> 
>> From a 2011 point of view, the informative first part is not very good. I'd like to replace all of it with new text that is:
>> 
>> * significantly shorter
>> * more relevant to understanding RDF
>> * a better reflection of 2011 understanding
>> * introduces more useful terms not mentioned in the 2004 version
>> (resource, vocabulary, concrete syntax, …)
>> * less redundant with the later normative sections
>> 
>> I've drafted new text (using bits of the old text where possible). It's ~2 pages.
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Rcygania2/RDF_Concepts_Introduction
>> 
>> I'd appreciate comments on the draft, and please speak up if you have fundamental concerns about this step.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Richard
>> 
>> 
>> (Housekeeping: ISSUE-68)
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Saturday, 12 November 2011 11:22:43 UTC