- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:14:47 +0000
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I implemented the ISSUE-71 resolution. Before the change (but post ISSUE-12), literals were either “typed literals” or “language-tagged literals”. Now they are all simply “literals”. Those with the datatype IRI rdf:langString are special and have a language tag besides the lexical form and datatype IRI. The text that makes it happen is in these sections: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-Graph-Literal http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-Literal-Value http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-Literals A full diff is here (the diff tool is a bit crappy, if anyone knows a good one please share): http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/diffs/rdf-concepts-langstring.html As per Jeremy's amendment to the ISSUE-71 resolution, I assigned an ACTION to the RDF Semantics editor: [[ Modify RDF Semantics appropriately to hard-code the class extension of rdf:langString to the set of all pairs of strings and language tags. ]] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/120 This completes ACTION-97. Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:15:19 UTC