- From: Charles Greer <cgreer@marklogic.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:46:22 -0800
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Charles Greer <Charles.Greer@marklogic.com>, William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>, "phayes@ihmc.us" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
In contrast, I've been arguing for at least *allowing* people to use standards for what the fourth column means, to allow useful communication between systems. For example, if we want to publish licensing information about a database (set of triples), we need to be able to name it in some unambiguous way. Might there be a difference between the use of the quad therefore in interchange (lean toward/require standard usage) vs within a triple store? Is this within the scope of RDF spec? -- Charles Greer Senior Engineer MarkLogic Corporation charles.greer@marklogic.com Phone: +1 707 408 3277 www.marklogic.com This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 19:46:52 UTC