Re: What can/should/must we do with rdf:PlainLiteral?

On 20 Jun 2011, at 15:20, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> my main hope is that other documents (i.e. SPARQL) that refer to the term "plain literal" will automagically adopt the new meaning once the new RDF documents are published.

I understand.

Let's pick this discussion up again when the RDF Concepts editors have proposed concrete words.

Best,
Richard

Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 14:39:47 UTC