- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:20:39 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 6/20/2011 7:31 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 19 Jun 2011, at 18:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> Richard, do you see any way to implement the recent resolution >> without removing the term "plain literal" from the abstract >> syntax? > > When you say “abstract syntax”, do you mean “abstract syntax” or “the > RDF 1.1 Concepts document”? I guess I mean the latter -- my main hope is that other documents (i.e. SPARQL) that refer to the term "plain literal" will automagically adopt the new meaning once the new RDF documents are published. Lee > > The resolution *has* removed plain literals without language tags > from the abstract syntax. It does not affect plain literals with > language tags; but let's see what the WG resolves to do about these. > > Richard
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 14:21:08 UTC