- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:11:22 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Jun 8, 2011, at 09:44, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 08/06/11 01:31, David Wood wrote: >> I have heard that the SPARQL WG is not particularly interested in >> addressing substantive comments. > > Really? Yes, but that doesn't mean the comments I have heard are authoritative. Regards, Dave > > SPARQL-WG is in Last Call. I can't speak for the group, but I, for one, take comments seriously. > > (Someone (here at SemTech) has wondered why it takes the WG (any WG) so long to respond to comments but it is because it is a group-agreed response, not an individual response from an editor which was their impression.) > > Andy >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:11:51 UTC