- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:49:08 -0400
- To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Issue-59 talks about representing arbitrary graph structures in RDF/XML, but the trail leads back to a discussion of representing bnodes in RDF/XML, e.g., _:a1 <http://random.ioctl.org/#p1> _:a2 . _:a2 <http://random.ioctl.org/#p2> _:a1 . not about the "usual" issue of triples whose predicate cannot be written as an XML entity name (or whatever the actual XML nomenclature really is). However, this is no longer a problem, because rdf:nodeID was added to RDF/XML. I think that the confusion here was that the WG thought that the problem was about the other RDF/XML inadequacy. So, I propose that we close ISSUE-59 as "Opened in error". peter
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:51:23 UTC