- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:55:02 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
The agenda for today says:
> g-snap: "RDF graph"
I can live with this, but I'd be much happier if we also came up with a
retronymic clarifying expansion, like "(abstract) RDF Graph", or
"(mathematical) RDF Graph" to use when we needed to be sure to exclude
all the loose usages.
> g-box: "RDF graph resource"?
-1 on "resource" -- in RDF, everything is a resource, certainly
including g-snaps.
There's nothing I really like here, but I could live with "graph
container" or "triplestore".
> g-text: <no name>? "RDF graph serialization/representation"?
I'm happy with "RDF graph serialization". -1 on "representation",
since the representation relationship is so vague and used in so many
other ways in RDF.
-- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 14:55:16 UTC