- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:31:02 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 15/07/11 17:17, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > == RDF URI Reference == > "RDF URI Reference" still shows up in three places. Should we change it > to IRI or wait for the RDF model spec to evolve? The same goes for > datatype URI which I assume will evolve towards an IRI. Slightly different - "RDF URI Reference" is a specific RDF term which we're changing. A datatype URI is a normal URI. > == Base URI == > Is "Base URI" such a universal concept that I should be hesitant about > s/Base URI/Base IRI/? (Note, this impacts grammar and definition.) Uniformly using "IRI" seems to me to be better. A para of text somewhere at the beginning of concepts, explaining this woudl be helpful but, as a spec, I think we should use be uniofrm and use the same, correct term everywhere. "RDF URI Reference" is a precursor for IRI. Andy
Received on Saturday, 16 July 2011 15:31:32 UTC