- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:36:21 -0500
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- CC: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 12/19/2011 5:33 AM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > As I hope people won't be publishing datasets, there really isn't any > problem with this. Really, we have to preserve the triple format as the > standard way of publishing data on the Web. Datasets should only be an > exchange format and data model for systems that manage data. This seems like a fine point of view to me. > If we ever see the emergence of datasets as the dominant way of > publishing data online, then we face the problem of having to > compartiment datasets from different sources, and go for N-Quints and > define Dataset-sets and reiterate all the hard work of this WG later. > > Once you acknowledge this, you understand that the "named" graphs inside > the datasets are just saying "there is an RDF graph containing those > triples, it is labelled with this 'name' and we don't care whether it is > asserted or not". Do we care whether a relational table is "asserting" > something in a database? Yup, this matches how we use named graphs. Lee >> >> Pat >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC >> (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. >> (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 >> 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 >> mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 18:36:54 UTC