- From: Dan Brickley <danbri2011@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:00:33 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: "Antoine Zimmermann , public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
On 19 Dec 2011, at 19:36, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > On 12/19/2011 5:33 AM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: >> As I hope people won't be publishing datasets, there really isn't any >> problem with this. Really, we have to preserve the triple format as the >> standard way of publishing data on the Web. Datasets should only be an >> exchange format and data model for systems that manage data. > > This seems like a fine point of view to me. > How is exchanging different from publishing? Dan >> If we ever see the emergence of datasets as the dominant way of >> publishing data online, then we face the problem of having to >> compartiment datasets from different sources, and go for N-Quints and >> define Dataset-sets and reiterate all the hard work of this WG later. >> >> Once you acknowledge this, you understand that the "named" graphs inside >> the datasets are just saying "there is an RDF graph containing those >> triples, it is labelled with this 'name' and we don't care whether it is >> asserted or not". Do we care whether a relational table is "asserting" >> something in a database? > > Yup, this matches how we use named graphs. > > Lee > >>> >>> Pat >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC >>> (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. >>> (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 >>> 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 >>> mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 18:18:56 UTC