- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:07:23 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-text@w3.org
Sandro Hawke wrote: > Can't we just say, as strongly as we need to, that rdf:text is NOT for > use in RDF? Instead it is for use in *non-RDF* systems which use XML > datatypes and want interoperability with RDF's language-tagged literals? > > I know that hasn't been made very clear, to date. New title: > > rdf:text -- an equivalent to RDF Plain Literals for non-RDF systems > > We can be more precise about this in the body -- I like Dave Reynold's > description of how RIF is not an RDF system, but is still compatible -- > but mostly this just seems like a PR problem. > > I think there's also an open question of whether to allow empty language > tags, and whether RDF plain literals without language tags should be > mapped to xs:strings instead of rdf:text, but I bet we can solve those a > lot more easily after we're clear about rdf:text's place in the world. > > -- Sandro All, I am personally fine with this and/or Andy's suggested wording: Maybe doing both the title change and adding the respective paragraph is no harm... One last proposal (if you think changing this is at all feasible): Wouldn't it make things MUCH clearer than if we change the name to the datatype to just rdf:PlainLiteral I have the feeling that with that name the intention is much clearer than rdf:text and somewhat it even "hints" why it is not a good idea to use it in RDF systems, since in RDF systems there is already a unique standard syntax for plain literals. E.g. (modifying Andy's proposed text accordinglt:) """ Systems that employ SPARQL with entailment regimes that cover D-entailment of rdf:PlainLiteral, MUST expose their results in the RDF forms. This condition is met when the scoping graph contains literals in the RDF forms plain literals and xsd:string and does not mention rdf:PlainLiteral as a datatype. """ Opinions? One thing I am not sure still: It was pointed out that we cannot prevent people from writing graphs using rdf:text as a datatype explicitly. Is that a problem? Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 22:08:08 UTC