- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 21:42:43 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-tests@w3.org
Hi Gregg, +1 to all, perhaps except: > * Some updates, e.g. more extensive updates to the SPARQL test suite, may require branching off of a separate feature branch, so that a set of changes can be staged before updating the main branch. We may want to use a “sparql11-rev-1” branch for this purpose. Could we perhaps prefix feature branches, for instance with feature- ? > * After a changes to a given test suite become stable, a “release” branch can be created to record the state of the test suite at that time; this also becomes the best target for subsequent implementation reports. Shouldn't this be "gh-pages" then? Or what else will be in "gh-pages"? Alternatively, it could be just "master" instead of "release". Best, Ruben
Received on Monday, 7 September 2015 19:43:13 UTC