- From: Khalil Ahmed <kal@networkedplanet.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 20:45:18 +0100
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, public-rdf-tests@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi Gregg, > > +1 to all, perhaps except: > >> * Some updates, e.g. more extensive updates to the SPARQL test suite, may require branching off of a separate feature branch, so that a set of changes can be staged before updating the main branch. We may want to use a “sparql11-rev-1” branch for this purpose. > > Could we perhaps prefix feature branches, for instance with feature- ? > +1 >> * After a changes to a given test suite become stable, a “release” branch can be created to record the state of the test suite at that time; this also becomes the best target for subsequent implementation reports. > > Shouldn't this be "gh-pages" then? > Or what else will be in "gh-pages"? > Alternatively, it could be just "master" instead of "release". > Perhaps just tag the relevant commit on gh-pages ? Cheers Kal
Received on Monday, 7 September 2015 19:49:42 UTC