Re: It was all written!

I doubt it has the same meaning of the current RDF* proposal. Maybe it's a shortened form for something else, or something else entirely. I can't find any description of what RDF* meant (in 2006).


> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2021 at 11:09 AM
> From: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
> To: "Laura Morales" <lauretas@mail.com>
> Cc: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: It was all written!
>
> item 3 in the list of rules :)
> 
> On 04/05/2021 11:06, Laura Morales wrote:
> > Where exactly? It's a long document to read and I couldn't find anything about it at first glance.
> >
> >
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2021 at 9:43 AM
> >> From: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu>
> >> To: "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> >> Subject: It was all written!
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just discovered that, in his principles of Linked Data, back in 2009,
> >> Tim already recommended the use of RDF*!
> >>
> >>     https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
> >>
> >> :-D
> >>
> >>
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2021 09:23:39 UTC