Or also a kind of "everything around the RDF standards", (at that time) so the RDF* (for not repeating himself) On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:12 AM Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com> wrote: > it's kind of a typo! ... don't get all worked up about it :) like in the > "star sceheme" > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Ghislain ATEMEZING < > ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Interesting! So what are we doing here if the standard was already their >> in 2009? >> >> BTW, I still don’t see an explanation of that mention RDF* and the >> explanation of the 3rd rule. Maybe that explains also why this group exist >> today :) >> >> >> Ghislain >> >> >> Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any brevity or typing errors >> >> >> Le 4 mai 2021 à 09:47, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> a écrit : >> >> On 04/05/2021 09.43, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I just discovered that, in his principles of Linked Data, back in 2009, >> Tim already recommended the use of RDF*! >> >> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html >> >> :-D >> >> >> >> https://twitter.com/csarven/status/1254394986860331008 >> >> -Sarven >> https://csarven.ca/#i >> >> > > -- > > > --- > Marco Neumann > KONA > > -- "*Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none*" (W. Shakespeare) Web: http://atemezing.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 2021 09:18:42 UTC