Re: SPARQL* evaluation semantics and RDF* semantics

this must be a trick question.
what’s the catch?

> On 2021-01-25, at 11:15:34, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@ercim.eu> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> in the discussions about RDF* semantics, I have made an assumption which I want to check with the community before going further.
> 
> I assume that we want the SPARQL* evaluation semantics and the RDF* model-theoretic semantics to be aligned, i.e. consistent with each other.
> 
> In other words, given two RDF* graphs G1 and G2,
> whenever the MT semantics says that G1 entails G2,
> any SPARQL* compliant system containing G1 should return true on the query "ASK { ... }" where "..." is a SPARQL* representation of G2.
> 
> FTR: this is currently the case for RDF simple entailment and SPARQL.
> 
> What's your position about that?
> 
>