- From: Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:17:57 +0100
- To: Laura Morales <lauretas@mail.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ-ZGXrTCrtx7c8TRmznAYr5Nenh59r=9QEi0rY29+qk_bYUZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:40 AM Laura Morales <lauretas@mail.com> wrote: > What about this instead? > > :a :knows {:since 1900; :source "..."} :b . > ^^ This is exactly what we did last year when we were thinking about syntaxes: https://www.stardog.com/docs/#_syntax_es It works pretty great with all the Turtle shortcuts (iirc that was partly the motivation). Note that it has implications for TriG since :g { :a :knows {:since 1900; :source "..."} :b } makes it obvious that both :a :knows :b and the annotations are asserted in :g. This was a plus for us since Stardog asserts embedded statements in the same NG but someone can regard it as a lack of flexibility (which is true about PG in general, not really a syntax issue). Not really suggesting for standardisation, just mentioning since it came up. Cheers, Pavel > > or > > :a :knows <<:since 1900; :source "...">> :b . > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2021 at 3:01 PM > > From: "thomas lörtsch" <tl@rat.io> > > To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de> > > Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org, "Miel Vander Sande" < > miel.vandersande@meemoo.be>, "Andy Seaborne" <andy@apache.org>, "Ghislain > ATEMEZING" <ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: A different symbol for {| > > > > +1 > >
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 09:18:22 UTC