Re: A different symbol for {|

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:40 AM Laura Morales <lauretas@mail.com> wrote:

> What about this instead?
>
>     :a :knows {:since 1900; :source "..."} :b .
>

^^ This is exactly what we did last year when we were thinking about
syntaxes: https://www.stardog.com/docs/#_syntax_es  It works pretty great
with all the Turtle shortcuts (iirc that was partly the motivation).

Note that it has implications for TriG since :g { :a :knows {:since 1900;
:source "..."} :b } makes it obvious that both :a :knows :b and the
annotations are asserted in :g. This was a plus for us since Stardog
asserts embedded statements in the same NG but someone can regard it as a
lack of flexibility (which is true about PG in general, not really a syntax
issue).

Not really suggesting for standardisation, just mentioning since it came up.

Cheers,
Pavel


>
> or
>
>     :a :knows <<:since 1900; :source "...">> :b .
>
>
>
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2021 at 3:01 PM
> > From: "thomas lörtsch" <tl@rat.io>
> > To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>
> > Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org, "Miel Vander Sande" <
> miel.vandersande@meemoo.be>, "Andy Seaborne" <andy@apache.org>, "Ghislain
> ATEMEZING" <ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: A different symbol for {|
> >
> > +1
>
>

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 09:18:22 UTC