- From: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:35:26 +1030
- To: "Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "public-rdf-star@w3.org" <public-rdf-star@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACusdfSqrQRyo-3RxDsO8kis_1q-RY642=Vas6EgC8bPKtu+8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Agreeing with Dan here, you could argue that any instance of schema:Event is also an example. Taking Simon's example: Bob - is captain of - Bowls Club - Jan 1, 2019–Dec 31, 2019 Bob - is captain of - Bowls Club - Jan 1, 2020–Dec 31, 2020 Seems equivalent to: schema:Event Bob's captaincy of Bowls Club 2019 startTime: Jan 1, 2019 endTime: Dec 31, 2019 schema:Event Bob's captaincy of Bowls Club 2020 startTime: Jan 1, 2020 endTime: Dec 31, 2020 It seems natural to me that every triple should have start and end time positions and possibly also a location position. The above examples seem to me like different ways of saying the same thing, albeit the first has more structure. You could argue that schema:Event is just a convenience type for statements with temporal data. YAGO knowledge base is a good example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370212000719 Regards Anthony On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:20 AM Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) < Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: > Captain of the bowls club is another example. > > (I was in one of these the other day admiring the wooden honour boards – > the same names come up repeatedly but not necessary sequentially.) > > > > *From:* Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, 9 December, 2021 22:57 > *To:* public-rdf-star@w3.org > *Subject:* OnAgainOffAgain relations - beyond celeb marriage: Org > membership > > > > > > The celebrity re-marriage example is interesting and real, but may look a > bit artificial or cornercase. A similarly structured situation is much more > common - membership of organizations. > > > > For example one organization being a member of another. > > > > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q51698517 is the International Fact > Checking Network (IFCN). It has a notion of membership grounded in review > of members w.r.t. their official principles. > > > > Verified signatories are e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30325238 > (Full Fact). There are some organizations such as Snopes ( > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2287154) who were once members (verified > signatories) but who are not currently. > > > > Wikidata uses annotations on a https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P463 > edge between IFCN and Snopes to give start/end times ( > > 15 April 2017, 5 June 2019). It also points to evidence/source document. > > > > As far as I know Snopes have only been members once, but if they were to > rejoin it seems Wikidata could accomodate the task of representing this. > > > > Until I learn a better name for it that isn't too grandiose, I am calling > these "on again, off again" relationships, in honour of the celebrity > marriage/divorce usecase. > > > > Dan > > > > p.s. another example, not quite notable enough for Wikidata to record: > > I (https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q56641640) have twice been a member of > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7552326 (AISB - Society for the Study of > Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour). But then I have > multiple times lived in the U.K., or been in various restaurants; how do we > scope RDF-Star's applicability? Which of these are reasonable places it > could be used for time-scoped relationships? > > >
Received on Friday, 10 December 2021 03:05:53 UTC