- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 20:46:02 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Although RDF is in some sense a logic, this is not really relevant to the discussion here. There is no requirement that a logic be based on sets (or set-like graphs) instead of multi-sets (or multi-set-like graphs). SPARQL and SPARQL* do not use the logic of RDF. They have no more semantic commitment than retrieval from property graphs. peter > On 12/3/21 6:31 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >> I think that presenting this feature of RDF as a "restriction" is unfair, >> and misses the point. In my view, the impedance mismatch between RDF and >> PGs is not due to some arbitrary restriction on the RDF model. It is due to >> the fact that RDF is a logic, that can be represented as a graph, while PG >> is a graph data model, without any semantic commitment.
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2021 01:46:18 UTC