W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-star@w3.org > February 2020

Re: How is RDF* supposed to work with Linked Data?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 22:10:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=4z2JdZuCpTAM3VcYkf3cfaMX1fdfPKaE=er9d0m7LS=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, 22:03 Martynas Jusevičius, <martynas@atomgraph.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've read Kurt Cagle's post:
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/state-graph-merger-property-graphs-semantic-kurt-cagle/
>
> The reification looks neat. But it seems to me that Linked Data* would
> be broken.
>
> The idea with Linked Data is to follow the links. But <<city:_Seattle
> city:isConnectedTo city:_SanFranciso>> has no URI, so how should we
> address it on the web?
>

RDF has the same issues too. Decent stable public URIs are a privilege not
a right, and can be checked for at higher levels...


> Martynas
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2020 22:10:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 4 February 2020 22:10:51 UTC