- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:12:19 -0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-Id: <C61BB745-842B-4CF4-98A7-3542E0A4162F@greggkellogg.net>
In light of turtle-star-syntax-bad-03.ttl, perhaps we need one with a non-empty embedded BlankNodePropertyList as being a bad syntax case: PREFIX : <http://example/> :s :p [:p2 :o2] . <<:s :p [:p2 :o2] >> :q 456 . Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net > On Dec 6, 2020, at 3:04 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > I ran this through my Ruby-based distiller [1] and passed all but the following: > > * turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet > * turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet > * turtle-star-syntax-bad-03.ttl – Bug on my part > > We might consider a recursive example, such as the following: > > @prefix ex: <http://example/ <http://example/>> . > << > <<ex:s2 ex:p2 ex:o2>> > ex:p1 ex:o1 >> > ex:p ex:o . > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net> > > [1] http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA <http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA> > >> On Dec 5, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> DONE: >> > ACTION: andys to add a test-suite for Turtle* >> >> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax> >> >> These are initial input for syntax tests for triple terms: << >> with both positive and negative tests. As syntax tests these are not defining the resulting RDF. >> >> In addition, there are two about triple annotation: >> >> turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl >> turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl >> >> There is a companion GH issue: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/53 >> >> Andy >> >
Received on Monday, 7 December 2020 21:12:34 UTC