- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 01:43:56 -0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Indeed, sorry I missed it on my scan. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPad > On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:13 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 06/12/2020 23:04, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> I ran this through my Ruby-based distiller [1] and passed all but the following: >> * turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet >> * turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet >> * turtle-star-syntax-bad-03.ttl – Bug on my part >> We might consider a recursive example, such as the following: >> @prefix ex: <http://example/> . >> << >> <<ex:s2 ex:p2 ex:o2>> >> ex:p1 ex:o1 >> >> ex:p ex:o . > > Such as > > turtle-star-syntax-nested-01.ttl > > PREFIX : <http://example/> > > :s :p :o . > > <<:s :p :o >> :r :z . > > << <<:s :p :o >> :r :z >> :q 1 . > > ? > > Andy > >> Gregg Kellogg >> gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net> >> [1] http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA <http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA> >>>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> DONE: >>> > ACTION: andys to add a test-suite for Turtle* >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax> >>> >>> These are initial input for syntax tests for triple terms: << >> with both positive and negative tests. As syntax tests these are not defining the resulting RDF. >>> >>> In addition, there are two about triple annotation: >>> >>> turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl >>> turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl >>> >>> There is a companion GH issue: >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/53 >>> >>> Andy >>>
Received on Monday, 7 December 2020 09:44:12 UTC