Re: Turtle* test suite

On 06/12/2020 23:04, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> I ran this through my Ruby-based distiller [1] and passed all but the 
> following:
> 
> * turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet
> * turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl – Don’t support these annotations yet
> * turtle-star-syntax-bad-03.ttl – Bug on my part
> 
> We might consider a recursive example, such as the following:
> 
> @prefix ex: <http://example/> .
> <<
>    <<ex:s2 ex:p2 ex:o2>>
>      ex:p1 ex:o1 >>
>    ex:p ex:o .
> 

Such as

  turtle-star-syntax-nested-01.ttl

PREFIX : <http://example/>

:s :p :o .

<<:s :p :o >> :r :z .

<< <<:s :p :o >> :r :z >> :q 1 .

?

     Andy

> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> 
> [1] 
> http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA 
> <http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/distiller?command=serialize&format=turtle&output_format=ntriples&rdfstar=SA>
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2020, at 10:11 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org 
>> <mailto:andy@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> DONE:
>> > ACTION: andys to add a test-suite for Turtle*
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax 
>> <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/tree/main/tests/turtle/syntax>
>>
>> These are initial input for syntax tests for triple terms: << >> with 
>> both positive and negative tests. As syntax tests these are not 
>> defining the resulting RDF.
>>
>> In addition, there are two about triple annotation:
>>
>> turtle-star-annotation-1.ttl
>> turtle-star-annotation-2.ttl
>>
>> There is a companion GH issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/53
>>
>>    Andy
>>
>

Received on Monday, 7 December 2020 09:14:07 UTC