- From: Steve Sarsfield <steve.sarsfield@cambridgesemantics.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:38:02 -0400
- Cc: public-rdf-star@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL3k4tXew_5p5JkV51iLHKDq20zOXP6s61yAGM0XUAHAxrktVA@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, AnzoGraph DB does 2. Re 1: Against restricting the RDF* spec to SA. Not sure why you'd do that with many vendors in support of PG. For us, the train of thought is about building a bridge to the Neo4J users of the world, potentially sharing ecosystems, tools, etc. *Steve SarsfieldAnzoGraph DB* On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 1:22 PM Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com> wrote: > Stardog does (2). Re: (1), it seems orthogonal to the SA vs PG discussion. > We can see ourselves supporting that (as well as nesting) if there's > demand, we don't expect any technical challenges there. > > Cheers, > Pavel > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:02 PM Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 15/08/2020 17:15, thomas lörtsch wrote: >> > Thanks for all responses, corrections and additions and an accordingly >> updated list: >> > >> > >> > SA PG Implementation Notes - Documentation >> > >> > + AllegroGraph in the works - >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2020Aug/0021.html >> > x AnzoGraph >> https://docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/v2.2/userdoc/lpgs.htm?Highlight=rdf >> > x BlazeGraph >> https://github.com/blazegraph/database/wiki/Reification_Done_Right >> > x GraphDB >> http://graphdb.ontotext.com/documentation/9.2/free/devhub/rdf-sparql-star.html >> > x Jena >> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/rdfstar/ >> > + + N3 deferred - >> https://github.com/w3c/N3/issues/27#issuecomment-644768502 >> > x rdf4j >> https://rdf4j.org/documentation/programming/rdfstar/ >> > x + rdfjs/N3.js PG may become configurable soon - >> https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model-spec/pull/165 >> > x x RubyRDF >> http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/yard/file.rdf-README.html#rdf-rdfstar >> > x Stardog >> https://www.stardog.com/docs/#_edge_properties >> > >> > >> > >> > I see a tendency towards PG mode. Comments from SA implementers >> suggested that they chose this approach also because going from SA to PG is >> easier than the other way round. Also some PG implementers don’t seem to be >> particularily enthused about SA mode. >> >> Great survey! >> >> Of the PG systems, how many: >> >> (1) Implement <<>> in the object position >> (2) Provide cascading deletion >> >> in their current releases? >> >> Andy >> >> > >> > Thomas >> >> >> > >> > >> >> On 10. Aug 2020, at 21:41, Steve Sarsfield < >> steve.sarsfield@cambridgesemantics.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Confirming that for AnzoGraph DB, this chart is correct. We support >> the property graph style. We don’t currently have any product roadmap >> planned for separate assertions. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Steve Sarsfield, AnzoGraph DB >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >>
Received on Monday, 17 August 2020 20:38:29 UTC