RDF* implementations and PG/SA modes (updated list)

Thanks for all responses, corrections and additions and an accordingly updated list:


  SA  PG  Implementation  Notes - Documentation

      +   AllegroGraph    in the works - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2020Aug/0021.html
      x   AnzoGraph       https://docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/v2.2/userdoc/lpgs.htm?Highlight=rdf
      x   BlazeGraph      https://github.com/blazegraph/database/wiki/Reification_Done_Right
  x       GraphDB         http://graphdb.ontotext.com/documentation/9.2/free/devhub/rdf-sparql-star.html
  x       Jena            https://jena.apache.org/documentation/rdfstar/
  +   +   N3              deferred - https://github.com/w3c/N3/issues/27#issuecomment-644768502
  x       rdf4j           https://rdf4j.org/documentation/programming/rdfstar/
  x   +   rdfjs/N3.js     PG may become configurable soon - https://github.com/rdfjs/data-model-spec/pull/165
  x   x   RubyRDF         http://rdf.greggkellogg.net/yard/file.rdf-README.html#rdf-rdfstar
      x   Stardog         https://www.stardog.com/docs/#_edge_properties



I see a tendency towards PG mode. Comments from SA implementers suggested that they chose this approach also because going from SA to PG is easier than the other way round. Also some PG implementers don’t seem to be particularily enthused about SA mode. 

Thomas


> On 10. Aug 2020, at 21:41, Steve Sarsfield <steve.sarsfield@cambridgesemantics.com> wrote:
> 
> Confirming that for AnzoGraph DB, this chart is correct. We support the property graph style. We don’t currently have any product roadmap planned for separate assertions. 
> 
>  
> 
> Steve Sarsfield, AnzoGraph DB
> 
>  
> 
>  
>

Received on Saturday, 15 August 2020 16:16:02 UTC