Re: ReSpec standards for RDF* and SPARQL*?

Hi all,

Great to see the recent announcements and discussions.

In terms of putting together a spec, we can do this under the RDF-DEV CG. I have already talked about it with Dan Brickley who chairs that group.

So, we can use the github repo of that group. In fact, a while back, I have already created an RDF*/SPARQL* related subdirectory in this repo:

https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/tree/master/RDFstar

That's where we can create a ReSpec document. 

I am on vacation this week and can start contributing next week.

Thanks,
Olaf 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com>
To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
Sent: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 2:41
Subject: Re: ReSpec standards for RDF* and SPARQL*?

I have no strong opinion on the hashtaggable names (other than another tale of woe whenever I try to  search for anything related to this stuff, whether it's google or my own mailbox) - they seem like good suggestions though.

And a big +1 on someone setting up a community space on github where we can document things. I'd contribute to that.

Jeen 

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, at 09:32, Wes Turner wrote:
> 1) Is there a plan to create a GH repo for a ReSpec document for RDF* and SPARQL*?
> There's a JSON-LD* draft ReSpec: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld-star
> 
> From "W3C REC / JSON-LD 1.2/2.0" https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld-star/issues/3 :
> > Is there a link to a ReSpec document for RDF*?
> >
> > Searching for "rdfstar" seems to be more practical.
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki
> - Docs: https://respec.org/docs/
> 
> https://github.com/sandhawke/gdoc2respec
> > Convert a Google Doc (gdoc) to a W3C respec HTML file using some half-baked rules
> 
> 2) Are these the preferred hashtaggable names (hames)?
> - rdfstar
> - sparqlstar
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2020 06:38:31 UTC