Re: ReSpec standards for RDF* and SPARQL*?

I have no strong opinion on the hashtaggable names (other than another tale of woe whenever I try to  search for anything related to this stuff, whether it's google or my own mailbox) - they seem like good suggestions though.

And a big +1 on someone setting up a community space on github where we can document things. I'd contribute to that.

Jeen 

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, at 09:32, Wes Turner wrote:
> 1) Is there a plan to create a GH repo for a ReSpec document for RDF* and SPARQL*?
> There's a JSON-LD* draft ReSpec: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld-star
> 
> From "W3C REC / JSON-LD 1.2/2.0" https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld-star/issues/3 :
> > Is there a link to a ReSpec document for RDF*?
> >
> > Searching for "rdfstar" seems to be more practical.
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki
> - Docs: https://respec.org/docs/
> 
> https://github.com/sandhawke/gdoc2respec
> > Convert a Google Doc (gdoc) to a W3C respec HTML file using some half-baked rules
> 
> 2) Are these the preferred hashtaggable names (hames)?
> - rdfstar
> - sparqlstar
> 
>