- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 21:01:28 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star@w3.org
On 03/09/2019 16:20, Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> Yes, I can lead that effort (if no one else wants to do it 😊)
Thank you!
>
> Here is a sample version [1] of a template to collect those use cases.
> It is based on a template with a contributor, a description of the use
> case and if possible links to other parts of the document (requirements).
>
> If you are happy with the idea, let me know where to push this draft so
> that people can just contribute in the document (if needed).
>
> HTH
>
> Best,
>
> Ghislain
>
> [1]
> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/gatemezing/work/blob/master/RDFStarUCandRequirements.html#Deliverables
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> */«Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none »/*(W. Shakespeare)
>
> Web : http://atemezing.org
>
> *De : *Olaf Hartig <mailto:olaf.hartig@liu.se>
> *Envoyé le :*lundi 2 septembre 2019 18:46
> *À : *Ghislain ATEMEZING <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>
> *Cc : *public-rdf-star@w3.org <mailto:public-rdf-star@w3.org>
> *Objet :*Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What
> arethepossibilities?
>
> Hi Ghislain,
>
> Sounds good.
>
> Would you volunteer to lead the effort of collecting such descriptions
> of use
>
> cases?
>
> Olaf
>
> On måndag 2 september 2019 kl. 15:17:48 CEST Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
>
> > Hi Olaf,
>
> > Re use cases consolidation
>
> >
>
> > I guess we can just collect them in a document as you are doing with the
>
> > spec. It will then be easier later on to reference and/or show the
> coverage
>
> > of the tech spec.
>
> >
>
> > HTH
>
> > Best,
>
> > Ghislain
>
> > ------------------------------------
>
> > «Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none » (W. Shakespeare)
>
> > Web : http://atemezing.org
>
> >
>
> > De : Olaf Hartig
>
> > Envoyé le :lundi 2 septembre 2019 09:49
>
> > À : Ghislain ATEMEZING
>
> > Cc : public-rdf-star@w3.org
>
> > Objet :Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What
> arethepossibilities?
>
> >
>
> > Hi Ghislain,
>
> >
>
> > On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 09:29 +0200, Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
>
> > > Hi Olaf,
>
> > >
>
> > > Thanks for the clarification. Without reading the spec of Turtle*, I
>
> > > can see now what can be feasible or not.
>
> >
>
> > Great.
>
> >
>
> > > Will it be possible to consolidate somehow use cases for RDF*?
>
> >
>
> > That's a great idea! Do you have a proposal of how such work may be
>
> > organized?
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Olaf
>
> >
>
> > > Sorry if I missed that from the previous threads.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Best,
>
> > >
>
> > > Ghislain
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > ------------------------------------
>
> > >
>
> > > «Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none » (W. Shakespeare)
>
> > >
>
> > > Web : http://atemezing.org
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > De : Olaf Hartig
>
> > > Envoyé le :dimanche 1 septembre 2019 21:11
>
> > > À : public-rdf-star@w3.org
>
> > > Cc : Ghislain ATEMEZING
>
> > > Objet :Re: Combining TriG / Named Graph / RDF* / - What are
>
> > > thepossibilities?
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Hi Ghislain,
>
> > >
>
> > > On lördag 31 augusti 2019 kl. 11:48:46 CEST Ghislain ATEMEZING wrote:
>
> > > > Hello,
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Let me ask what can be feasible by combining TriG notation / Named
>
> > >
>
> > > Graph /
>
> > >
>
> > > > RDF* all together. I give below some examples, and ask what could be
>
> > > >
>
> > > > covered or not with the new extension.
>
> > >
>
> > > Syntactically, each of these examples is possible. However, they may
>
> > > be
>
> > >
>
> > > interpreted to represent different things. In the following, below
>
> > > each of
>
> > >
>
> > > these examples, I will write what I would consider as a reasonable
>
> > >
>
> > > interpretation. To avoid a similar discussion as we had it in the
>
> > > other
>
> > >
>
> > > thread, I assume that the property ':claims' in your examples is
>
> > > replaced by a
>
> > >
>
> > > property called ':asserts'.
>
> > >
>
> > > > #1 - Alice claims sth in a named graph regarding Bob.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> foaf:name "Alice" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> :claims <http://example/graph/g> .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example/graph/g> {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:name "Bob" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:age "23"^^xsd:integer .
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > >
>
> > > My interpretation: Person Alice asserts the whole set of triples that
>
> > > make up
>
> > >
>
> > > the graph denoted by IRI <http://example/graph/g>.
>
> > >
>
> > > > #2- Alice claims sth in a graph regarding Bob with a confidence
>
> > >
>
> > > score
>
> > >
>
> > > > {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> foaf:name "Alice" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> :claims << <http://example/graph/g>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > :confidenceScore "0.8"^^xsd:double >> . }
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example/graph/g> {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:name "Bob" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:age "23"^^xsd:integer .
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > >
>
> > > My interpretation: Person Alice asserts that the graph denoted by IRI
>
> > > <http://
>
> > >
>
> > > example/graph/g> has a confidence score of 0.8.
>
> > >
>
> > > > #3- Alice claims sth in a graph regarding Bob with prov information
>
> > > >
>
> > > > {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> foaf:name "Alice" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Alice> :claims <http://example/graph/g> .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example/graph/g> {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> rdf:type foaf:Person .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:name "Bob" .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/Bob> foaf:age "23"^^xsd:integer .
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > {
>
> > > >
>
> > > > <http://example.org/graph/g> :prov << ex:website :lastUpdate
>
> > > >
>
> > > > "2018/10/06"^^xsd:date >>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > }
>
> > >
>
> > > My interpretation: First, as in example #1 above, person Alice asserts
>
> > > the
>
> > >
>
> > > whole set of triples that make up the graph denoted by IRI
>
> > > <http://example/
>
> > >
>
> > > graph/g>.
>
> > >
>
> > > Additionally (and totally independent of Alice's assertion), the
>
> > > provenance of
>
> > >
>
> > > that same graph is a triple saying that something denoted by the IRI
>
> > >
>
> > > ex:website was last updated on Oct.6, 2018.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > At its core, the latter sentence does not seem to make much sense
>
> > > ("the
>
> > >
>
> > > provenance of some graph is a specific triple"). However, that's what
>
> > > I would
>
> > >
>
> > > interpret from the nested RDF* triple at the end of your example #3.
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Best,
>
> > >
>
> > > Olaf
>
> > >
>
> > > > Best,
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Ghislain
>
> > > >
>
> > > > ------------------------------------
>
> > > >
>
> > > > «Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none » (W. Shakespeare)
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Web : http://atemezing.org
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > ---
>
> > > >
>
> > > > L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par
>
> > >
>
> > > le
>
> > >
>
> > > > logiciel antivirus Avast. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> > >
>
> > > Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
>
> >
>
> > ---
>
> > L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le
>
> > logiciel antivirus Avast. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2019 20:01:54 UTC