Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting

At the WG meeting last week, we focused on RDF Semantics.

ora:I like the idea of getting a sense of where we are in respect to the 
plan
https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-rdf-star-minutes.html#0ca6

. . .

*ora:* we can then discuss the remaining open issues in next Thursday's call
https://www.w3.org/2025/03/06-rdf-star-minutes.html#4636

SemTF met https://www.w3.org/2025/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html
<enrico>Once PR 91 and issues 98/85/76 are closed, the text of Semantics 
can be considered ready for review

Please can we use the agenda to start the review of RDF Semantics or 
identify work that is needed to get to that state.

     Andy

On 12/03/2025 14:39, Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar) wrote:
>
>
>     Agenda
>
>  1. Update about WG vote about triple terms in the subject position
>  2. map the annotation syntax to rdfs:states 1
>     <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/128>
>  3. the change to replace "must" with "should" for ill-typed term
>     values should be reverted pending further discussion 2
>     <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/147>
>  4. what properties can or should link to triple terms? 3
>     <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/127>
>  5. Streamline Turtle-star syntactic sugar and future-proof it for
>     graphs 4 <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/131>
>
> Scribe: Zimmermann, Antoine (alternate: Arndt, Dörthe)
> Next week's scribe: Arndt, Dörthe (alternate: Lindstroom, Niklas)
>
>