[wbs] response to 'Triple terms in the subject position'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Triple terms in
the subject position' (RDF-star Working Group) for Felix Sasaki.

> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Your preference
> 
> ----
> What is your preference with respect to allowing triple terms in the
> subject position?
> 
> 


 * ( ) allow triple terms in the subject position
 * (x) forbid triple terms in the subject position
 * ( ) no preference either way

Comments: 

I do not understand the technical implications fully. From reading other
contributions on the topic my impression is that it will make both
implementations as well as explaining RDF 1.2 easier if triple terms are
forbidden in the subject position. That motivates my vote.

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> About allowing them
> 
> ----
> Regardless of your preference expressed above,
>   can you live with RDF-Concepts allowing triple terms in the subject
> position?
> 
> 


 * (x) yes, I can live with it
 * ( ) no, I formally object to allowing triple terms in the subject
position in RDF-Concepts (please develop in the 'rationale' field below).

Rationale: 



> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> About forbidding them
> 
> ----
> Regardless of your preference expressed above,
>   can you live with RDF-Concepts forbidding triple terms in the subject
> position?
> 
> 


 * (x) yes, I can live with it
 * ( ) no, I formally object to forbidding triple terms in the subject
position in RDF-Concepts

Rationale: 



> 
> 
> These answers were last modified on 23 February 2025 at 16:47:23 U.T.C.
> by Felix Sasaki
> 
Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/139681/2025-rdf-star-tripleterms-subject/
until 2025-02-26.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Sunday, 23 February 2025 16:48:03 UTC