Re: privacy and security sections

Concepts does indeed have P&S sections.

If P&S Sections are required, how about this:


This document does not introduce any [privacy/security] considerations beyond 
those described in [RDF Concepts#[Privacy/Security].

peter


On 2/7/25 9:52 AM, Lassila, Ora wrote:
> I am not sure exactly how to word things, but I think I would prefer those documents to say "no issues" *and* point to Concepts (?) assuming it has a statement that covers essentially all of RDF. Having said that, makes me think if it would be possible to have a P&S statement *only* in Concepts and have all other documents point to it?
> 
> Ora
> 
> 
> On 2/6/25, 2:01 PM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We are supposed to have P&S sections in each document, I guess.
> 
> 
> What should do into document that have no P&S issues beyond what is inherent
> in RDF? Should they point to Concepts? If so, how? Or should they just say
> "no issues"? If so, how?
> 
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 7 February 2025 15:09:26 UTC