- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:01:28 -0400
- To: "ddooss@wp.pl" <ddooss@wp.pl>, RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
As far as I can tell, the two documents have the same information about tripleterm so a deficiency in this area in one document should also be a deficiency in the other. Do you also find the minimal baseline document deficient? In any case, tripleTerm corresponds with triple term in https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/#section-triple-terms. That document also matches the minimal baseline with the well-formed syntax being expressed as SHOULD in https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/#section-triples. peter On 10/26/24 8:39 AM, ddooss@wp.pl wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to highlight some missing information in the documentation > available at https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22alternative- > baseline%22 <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22alternative- > baseline%22>. It appears that the current version lacks details on certain key > aspects of the proposal. > > While the meaning of rdf:ReificationProperty can be somewhat inferred from the > context, the term rdf:tripleTerm is introduced without any context or > explanation, making it challenging to fully understand the concept. I kindly > request that more details be added to this wiki page to facilitate a clearer > understanding and evaluation of the proposal. > > Best regards, > Dominik > > > Dnia 25 października 2024 17:53 Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfpschneider@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > The Semantics Task Force discussed the basic semantics of triple terms at the > meeting on 25 October 2024 and decided that it was a good idea to have a > working group decision on which way to go in the very near future so that the > significant changes can be made to RDF Semantics and RDF Concepts to fully > support triple terms and how they are to be used in RDF 1.2. > > The current working group decision is defined in > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22minimal-baseline%22, > <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22minimal-baseline%22,> > where > rdf:reifies is the only property that links to triple terms. An alternative > that has been defined, in > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22alternative- > baseline%22, <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star- > %22alternative-baseline%22,> > is to allow any property that is an instance of rdf:ReificationProperty > (final > name to be determined) to link to triple terms. > > The issue https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/127 <https:// > github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/127> is basically about > this difference and has pointers to more information and discussion on the > difference between the approaches. The decision to be made is whether one > property (rdf:reifies) is allowed to link to triple terms, many properties > are > allowed, or only a very few properties are allowed (perhaps rdf:reifies and > rdfs:states). > > > peter >
Received on Saturday, 26 October 2024 13:01:35 UTC