- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:11:17 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 03/10/2024 17:01, James Anderson wrote:
> good afternoon;
>
>> On 3. Oct 2024, at 17:54, thomas@pellissier-tanon.fr wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for raising your concern!
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> Sorry for the bold question: do you plan to commit to setup this WG? Launching a WG is a lot of work and I am not sure the current SPARQL editors have enough time for that. I tend to think doing something is better than nothing and 11 years after SPARQL 1.1 it's maybe time to get something done.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> were there to be a working group - not a community group, to consider the issues related to exists/parameters/lateral i would certainly be prepared participate.
> i contributed to the community group for exists during its existence, i am aware of andy seaborne's effort and have corresponded with him on the topic, but i never had the impression that the work had reach the point of maturity that it should be considered for inclusion in a recommendation.
All my communication with james has been in public.
Andy
>
> best regards, from berlin
>
> ---
> james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2024 17:11:24 UTC