- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:01:46 +0200
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
good afternoon; > On 3. Oct 2024, at 17:54, thomas@pellissier-tanon.fr wrote: > > Thank you for raising your concern! > >> ... > > Sorry for the bold question: do you plan to commit to setup this WG? Launching a WG is a lot of work and I am not sure the current SPARQL editors have enough time for that. I tend to think doing something is better than nothing and 11 years after SPARQL 1.1 it's maybe time to get something done. > > Thomas were there to be a working group - not a community group, to consider the issues related to exists/parameters/lateral i would certainly be prepared participate. i contributed to the community group for exists during its existence, i am aware of andy seaborne's effort and have corresponded with him on the topic, but i never had the impression that the work had reach the point of maturity that it should be considered for inclusion in a recommendation. best regards, from berlin --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2024 16:02:06 UTC