- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:56:04 +0100
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> On 17. Mar 2024, at 19:11, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/03/2024 11:28, James Anderson wrote:
>> good morning;
>>> On 17. Mar 2024, at 11:47, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17/03/2024 08:45, John Walker wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> If so, being very simple here, could one entertain introducing a TRIPLE keyword somewhat analogous to GRAPH into the grammar for SPARQL and constrain that to only allow a single triple pattern.
>>>> WHERE {
>>>> GRAPH ?g {
>>>> ?s ?p ?o .
>>>> TRIPLE ?t { ?s ?p ?o }
>>>> ?t ?t_p ?t_o .
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>
>> a response which isolates just this single statement of fact in john walker's note:
>
> Correct - which is why the subject was changed.
another statement of fact.
which - just as the initial one, does nothing to answer the questions which john walker's message raised.
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2024 18:56:22 UTC