- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:56:04 +0100
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> On 17. Mar 2024, at 19:11, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 17/03/2024 11:28, James Anderson wrote: >> good morning; >>> On 17. Mar 2024, at 11:47, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 17/03/2024 08:45, John Walker wrote: >>> ... >>>> If so, being very simple here, could one entertain introducing a TRIPLE keyword somewhat analogous to GRAPH into the grammar for SPARQL and constrain that to only allow a single triple pattern. >>>> WHERE { >>>> GRAPH ?g { >>>> ?s ?p ?o . >>>> TRIPLE ?t { ?s ?p ?o } >>>> ?t ?t_p ?t_o . >>>> } >>>> } >>> >> a response which isolates just this single statement of fact in john walker's note: > > Correct - which is why the subject was changed. another statement of fact. which - just as the initial one, does nothing to answer the questions which john walker's message raised. --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2024 18:56:22 UTC