Re: Annotation syntax

> On 17. Mar 2024, at 19:11, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 17/03/2024 11:28, James Anderson wrote:
>> good morning;
>>> On 17. Mar 2024, at 11:47, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 17/03/2024 08:45, John Walker wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> If so, being very simple here, could one entertain introducing a TRIPLE keyword somewhat analogous to GRAPH into the grammar for SPARQL and constrain that to only allow a single triple pattern.
>>>> WHERE {
>>>>   GRAPH ?g {
>>>>     ?s ?p ?o .
>>>>     TRIPLE ?t { ?s ?p ?o }
>>>>     ?t ?t_p ?t_o .
>>>>   }
>>>> }
>>> 
>> a response which isolates just this single statement of fact in john walker's note:
> 
> Correct - which is why the subject was changed.

another statement of fact.
which - just as the initial one, does nothing to answer the questions which john walker's message raised.
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com

Received on Sunday, 17 March 2024 18:56:22 UTC