- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:33:04 +0000
- To: Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@tu-dresden.de>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> On 13 Mar 2024, at 13:57, Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@tu-dresden.de> wrote: > > P.S. Your latest solution is in my opinion indeed too radical. (But I already started to create tricky examples if you want to go there ;) ) Can you elaborate on that? After all, all the attempts to understand and fix the well-formedness in its various implications, are a consequence of the fact that we want to have (or better, we want to explain) only triple reification terms, and not triple terms. So, my proposal is to just to have directly only triple reification terms, and all the issues disappear magically… —e.
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2024 14:33:10 UTC