- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:27:28 +0000
- To: Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@tu-dresden.de>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2024 11:27:39 UTC
On 13 Mar 2024, at 12:24, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: On 13 Mar 2024, at 12:14, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: On 13 Mar 2024, at 11:37, Doerthe Arndt <doerthe.arndt@tu-dresden.de<mailto:doerthe.arndt@tu-dresden.de>> wrote: 1. Strictly speaking, in your grammar each triple of the form identifier_i rdf:reifies tripleTerm needs to be *directly* followed by a triple (subject predicate identifier_i) or (identifier_i predicate object)) Is that on purpose? (I think that is a minor remark, I was just curious :) ) Yes, it is needed if you want this grammar to capture exactly the macro expansion. It basically says that “edge” triples re not allowed to be alone. Maybe you meant *directly* also in the graph, but a graph is a set, so there is no notion of *directly* following… I now get you. Strictly speaking, we should fix this… —e.
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2024 11:27:39 UTC