- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:09:19 -0400
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 3/12/24 11:52, Franconi Enrico wrote: > Hi, > after our most recent discussions, I have updated the RDF-star semantics > document > <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF%E2%80%90star-semantics:-option-3 > <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF%E2%80%90star-semantics:-option-3>>. > More specifically, I think it may be worthwhile to have some feedback on the > section “Best practices and well-formedness”. > cheers > —e. This is ambiguous as the nor can be given a wide scope. "An RDF graph which does not contain any triple term nor any rdf:reifies triple but for the ones coming from the expansion of the macro for triple reification is called reification well-formed." Better would be "An RDF graph where the only triple terms are objects of triples with predicate rdf:reifies." This is unambiguous, but more liberal as it allows objects of rdf:reifies triples to be anything. I don't think that the liberalization causes any problems. peter
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2024 22:09:26 UTC