- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:32:06 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2024 15:32:12 UTC
On 22 Aug 2024, at 17:09, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: 1 – Is this a syntactic or a semantic restriction? Simple entailment RDF doesn't express e.g. cardinalities, so I was imaging a profile to have syntactic restrictions c.f. SHACL. The target domain does not have semantics. We have to consider whether higher-level semantics imply anything about the target domain. LPGs do have a semantic interpretation (definition 2 and 3 in [1]), which is captured consistently by the RDF encoding with the either the syntactic or the semantic restrictions. —e. [1] https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2023.1
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2024 15:32:12 UTC