Re: A proposal for basing quotation and annotation upon blank graphs

As an amusing coincidence, Tim's rant during the TPAC F2F (and the 
discussions that followed) also got me thinking, and I wrote down a few 
things here:

https://hackmd.io/_kG54skVQle0KT2S85Tj1Q


The approach is slightly less radical than Niklas' . I tried to explore 
various ways to support N3-like graph-terms, by breaking more or less 
(and hopefully less...) what we already have.


On 20/09/2023 19:41, Niklas Lindström wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have written a proposal for basing quotation and annotation upon
> "blank graphs'" (graphs named by bnodes):
>
>      https://gist.github.com/niklasl/4f52c32ef2d888c172c8584e36c24610

>
> While I am rather convinced (by the various concerns raised) that this
> is the right direction, it represents a fairly drastic change (for
> RDF-star, that is; not for RDF 1.1). I did not approach it lightly,
> having thought long and hard about where we are, and (carefully, I
> hope) weighing alternatives, for many months, if not years.
>
> If there is interest, I can introduce it during the WG or Semantics TF
> telecon this week.
>
> Best regards,
> Niklas
>