Re: FPWD published

Gregg,

this would indeed be a natural extension of our current naming scheme. 
Thanks for compiling the list.

I don't know what the process is for that, but I just sent an email to 
the system team to inquiry.

   pa

On 17/05/2023 23:49, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> I was going to make a PR to specref, but that won’t handle the /TR 
> aliases which need to be in place. PA, perhaps you can get the pub 
> team to add the following links to /TR
>
> TR/rdf10-concepts – https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/

> TR/rdf10-primer – http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/

> TR/rdf10-schema – https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-schema-20040210/

> TR/rdf10-semantics – http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/

> TR/rdf10-xml – http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/

> TR/sparql10-protocol – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-protocol-20080115/

> TR/sparql10-query – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115/

> TR/sparql10-results-xml – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321/

>
> TR/rdf11-concepts – Link in place
> TR/rdf11-n-quads – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-n-quads-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-n-triples – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-n-triples-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-primer – Link in place
> TR/rdf11-new – Link in place
> TR/rdf11-schema – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-semantics – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-trig – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-trig-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-turtle – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-turtle-20140225/

> TR/rdf11-xml – http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20140225/

> TR/sparql11-entailment – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-federated-query – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-graph-store-protocol – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20130321/

> TR/sparql11-concepts – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-overview-20130321/

> TR/sparql11-protocol – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-query – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-results-csv-tsv – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-results-json – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-results-xml – 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321/

> TR/sparql11-service-description – Link in place
> TR/sparql11-update – Link in place
>
> Additionally, the “New Version Available” bugs in the 1.0 documents 
> should probably instead be the more aggressive “This version is 
> outdated!” message.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
>> On May 17, 2023, at 1:48 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On May 17, 2023, at 1:21 PM, Timothée Haudebourg 
>>> <timothee.haudebourg@spruceid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, I just noticed the https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ URL 
>>> (without the "12" version tag) also serves the FPWD. I wasn't 
>>> expecting that, I thought this URL would only show the final version 
>>> and not the drafts (or maybe just a link to the drafts?). Maybe 
>>> that's how it is supposed to work I don't know I'm not that familiar 
>>> with the release process. What I'm worried about though is it seems 
>>> impossible to access the RDF1.1 version anymore. There is no link to 
>>> it. The "History" link only shows the FPWD.
>>
>> That is how versioned numbers work, rdf-schema will point to the 
>> latest version, in this case the 1.2 FPWD. Note that it has a “Latest 
>> Recommendation” link that should point to rdf11-schema, which should 
>> get you to the 1.1 version of the document (This works for RDF 
>> Concepts), but I think those 1.1 versions were never properly named.
>>
>> The pubs team should make sure that rdf11-schema points to 
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/, which PA should 
>> be able to help facilitate. Also, the 1.2 version “prevRecShortname” 
>> should be changed to “rdf11-schema”, when that points to the right 
>> place. There should also be rdf10-schema links.
>>
>> This looks like a pervasive issue now, as the previous recommendation 
>> links were, e.g., to “rdf-schema” and similar in other recommendations.
>>
>> To be clear, rdf10-xxx should get you to the 1.0 version of xxx, 
>> similar for sparql10-xxx. THe rdf11-xxx (and sparql11-xxx) links 
>> should get you to those versions, and we’ll need to update the 
>> “prevRecShortname” in our documents accordingly.
>>
>> Gregg
>>
>>> -- 
>>> Timothée
>>>
>>>
>>
>