- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:33:54 +0200
- To: RDF-star WG <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b9182d4c-7480-7522-87b5-65ba8c12205c@w3.org>
Dear all,
following our discussion last week [1] on PRs and the dashboard, I have
- imported all pending PRs to the RDF-star GH project;
- set up GH actions in all our repos, that add any new PR to the project;
- set up a new view of all pending PRs :
https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4
This view is sorted by labels, which is may become messy if PRs get many
labels, but works pretty well for the moment:
- all issues with the 'need-discussion' label are currently grouped
together and at the top
- other issues are grouped by the spec:editorial, spec:enhancement and
spec:substantive labels
----
Regarding the labels, I added a description on some of the labels that
we inherited from other W3C repos. This is my interpretation of these
labels (roughly corresponding to class 1, class 2 and class 3 changes as
per the process [2]), but that's up for discussion:
* spec:substantive: "Issue or proposed change in the spec that changes
its normative content"
* spec:enhancement: "Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec
without changing the normative content substantively"
* spec:editorial: "Minor issue or proposed change in the specification
(markup, typo, informative text)"
Note also that I took the liberty to remove the tag 'Editorial' from a
bunch of issues / PRs where it was redundant (or used in the place of)
spec:editorial . As its description says, 'Editorial' is meant for
errata management.
best
[1] https://www.w3.org/2023/03/23-rdf-star-minutes.html#t05
[2] https://beta.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#correction-classes
Attachments
- application/pgp-keys attachment: OpenPGP public key
Received on Monday, 27 March 2023 12:33:57 UTC