Re: RDF-star WG weekly meeting of 2023 March 16 agenda

My email had multiple parts and the instructions for finding a part of the 
email were obscure.

So, no, the email could have been very much clearer that what was sent out to 
the working group.

peter


On 3/16/23 10:28, Adrian Gschwend wrote:
> On 16.03.23 21:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
>> This was completely unclear to me.  It is my view that agenda items should 
>> clearly state what will be discussed or proposed.
> 
> I linked to your email, cannot be more clear than this.
> 
> regards
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 16 March 2023 15:44:55 UTC